A recent case highlights a crucial point about the Honours system in Britain: it can reward individuals who are considered ‘unconventional’ or defy stereotypes, even if their achievements don’t fit traditional narratives. This article examines the award of an MBE to [Name], a figure known for their unconventional career path and background, sparking discussion about the meritocratic nature of such recognition. It delves into the criteria for receiving an MBE, explores potential biases within the selection process, and raises questions about how we define ‘merit’ in a diverse society. Ultimately, it argues that while the MBE is intended to celebrate excellence, its application must remain open to a wider range of talent, regardless of initial perceptions or social expectations.